 |
LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ON TRAVEL ABROAD
For those who have newly received their permanent residency, traveling outside of the U.S. is frequently goal since some have postponed foreign travel for years. While it is possible to travel quite freely using the green card, there are some restrictions. The key issue is that it is necessary to continue to permanently reside in the U.S. Otherwise one may run the risk of no longer being considered a permanent resident. Individuals who travel for extended periods may be regarded as having abandoned their permanent resident status. While the I-551 card or green card is the proper document for reentry after an absence of less than a year, permission to reenter is not guaranteed. The green card is only appropriate for entry if the individual has not abandoned permanent residence. The legal requirement is that the absence must be for less than a year and the person must be returning to an unrelinquished, lawful permanent residence after a temporary absence.
Lawful permanent residents or conditional permanent residents who wish to remain outside the U.S. for more than one year, may apply for a reentry permit. A reentry permit allows a permanent resident of the U.S. to reenter the U.S. after traveling abroad for longer than one year but less than two years. However, merely returning to U. S and simply using a reentry permit has little bearing on the question of whether the lawful permanent resident has maintained the intention to remain a permanent resident of the U.S.. In essence, you will need to prove that you will maintain ties to an unrelinquished lawful permanent residence in the United States. To determine whether the ties exist, USCIS looks at various factors, including: locations of family, property holdings, jobs, intention to return to the United States as a place of employment, business, or as an actual home.
IMMIGRATION CONSEQUENCES OF CERTAIN CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT
Permanent resident status may also be lost by committing certain crimes. Permanent residents remain subject to removal from the United States. There are a number of possible crime-related grounds for removal. Any permanent resident who is arrested for ANY reason should seek immigration advice from an attorney experienced in this area of the law prior to making decisions on how to proceed with the criminal case.
The safest approach is to simply avoid anything that may be construed as criminal activity. Sometimes one is not in full control of a situation. The most common issues that arise for otherwise law-abiding individuals are drunk driving, assault (domestic or otherwise), and shoplifting. Drunk-driving laws in most parts of the United States are quite strict. The alcohol levels needed for a criminal charge vary from state to state. Even a small amount of alcohol consumption prior to driving can result in a criminal charge in many states.
OBLIGATIONS REGARDING ADDRESS-CHANGE NOTIFICATION AND SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRATION
Permanent residents must continue to advise the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) of any address change within ten days using Form AR-11. Failure to file the form within ten days of moving is technically a removable offense. Each family member must file his or her own form. We recommend filing by certified or other traceable mail.
Male permanent residents, ages 18 to 25 must register for Selective Service. Intentional failure to comply with this requirement can prevent an individual from becoming a U.S. citizen.
CHANGE OF STATUS FROM B-1/B-2 TO H1B
One of the most frequently asked questions about H-1B (specialty occupation) is whether, when, and how a person on B-1/B-2 (temporary visitor) status may change his status to H-1B nonimmigrant worker. Change of status from B-1/B-2 to H-1B is not prohibited, but a person contemplating to do so must be aware of its ramifications.
Change of status from B-1/B-2 to H-1B presupposes that the person is present in the U.S. on temporary visitor status when the H-1B petition is filed. The H-1B petition would specifically request a change of status from temporary visitor to H-1B nonimmigrant worker. A change of status is employed when the B-1/B-2 visitor opts to stay in the U.S. to wait for the approval of his H-1B petition, with the intent to apply for an H-1B visa in the U.S. so they could commence their employment without having to go back to their home country.
A B-1/B-2 visitor status only provides the alien temporary stay in the U.S. While travelers on visitors visa may be given a maximum of six months stay in the U.S., there are often instances where the immigration officer limits the authorized stay to three months or even less. Given this very short period of authorized stay, a B-1/B-2 visitor should carefully evaluate the factors that could affect his maintenance of status in the U.S.
A temporary visitor must depart the U.S. on or before the last day he is authorized to be in the U.S. Failure to depart renders the person out-of-status and consequently, ineligible for change of status to H-1B. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) usually takes around 60 to 90 days to issue decisions on H-1B petitions. Even if the alien is granted six months of stay, they may still need to apply for an extension of stay to maintain valid status in the U.S. However, there is no assurance that the application for extension will be granted. Extensions are given only for valid reasons, and a pending H-1B petition is not among them. In the event that the application for extension is denied before the H-1B petition is approved, the alien would need to go back to their home country before their authorized duration of stay expires.
There are cases where the H-1B petition is approved but the request for change of status is not allowed. This occurs when the CIS is uncertain whether the alien will be in valid status when the H-1B petition is granted. Instead of granting the request for change of status, CIS may direct the alien to apply for an H-1B visa in the U.S. consulate office in their home country. In such cases, the alien has to depart the U.S. and obtain a visa from their home country, even if they have a pending or approved application for extension of stay.
Another important consideration is the so-called "60-day waiting period." As a rule, persons who come to the U.S. as temporary visitors on B-1 (business) or B-2 (pleasure or medical treatment) visa must use their visa for the specific purpose for which it was issued. Once a temporary visitor applies for a change of status to H-1B nonimmigrant worker, an issue arises as to his real intention for coming to the U.S. There is a presumption that the alien has a preconceived intent to look for a job if their application for change of status is made within 60 days from entry, for which reason the application may be denied. To avoid the presumption, the petitioning employer will have to wait for 60 days before filing an H-1B petition for the alien.
This brings us to the issue of visa availability. The alien may face the risk of being capped out due to the 60-day waiting period. There is no guarantee that there would be visa numbers still available by the time the petition is filed. There is an annual quota for H-1B visas of 65,000. A visa number must be available at the time the H-1B petition is adjudicated, otherwise, the petition will be returned. CIS starts accepting petitions for a given fiscal year (beginning October 1 and ending September 30) on April 1 (six months before the start of the fiscal year), and stops accepting after the quota has been filled. Historically, the quota always reaches its cap early. For the present fiscal year, the quota was reached as early as May 26, 2006. For the fiscal year 2006, it was reached on August 10, 2005.
Clearly, change of status from B-1/B-2 to H-1B is complicated and the alien attempting to pursue this approach without proper legal guidance is prone to committing mistakes that could cost him money, time, and lost opportunities. If the alien intends to pursue a work opportunity in the United States that they may have found while as a temporary visitor in this country, sometimes it is more prudent to go back to their home country, have the prospective US employer file an H-1B petition, wait for the approval of the petition, and thereafter apply for a visa in their country. Thus, the petition may be filed as soon as the acceptance of H-1B filings is opened and the person need not worry about the issue of preconceived intent or the requirement of maintaining valid status. However, many aliens are concerned about consular official denials. Balancing these concerns is the essence of the legal advice and choices in this area.
IMMIGRATION THROUGH INVESTMENT
Are you waiting for an immigrant visa in order to file your Adjustment of Status petition or are you hoping your labor certification will be approved so you may become a legal permanent resident (LPR) of the United States? If you are trying to become a LPR through employment-based petitions, we have bad news for you. The State Department released its March Visa Bulletin and for employment-based 3 rd category, the priority date is only August 2002. The 3rd employment-based preference covers aliens with offers of employment in the United States. Most of you probably fall under this category if you are professionals with bachelor’s degrees in your fields; skilled workers who are capable of performing a job requiring at least two years of training or experience; and unskilled workers. This means that even if your labor certification is approved you have to wait for your priority date to be current before you can apply for the Adjustment of Status (I-485) petition.
There are several ways to become a LPR in this country. You can get there by marriage to an U.S. citizen, by employment, as a special immigrant, as a person with extraordinary abilities or advanced degrees, or by investment. Since immigrant visas based on employment have become unavailable indefinitely, we will introduce a series of other avenues for an alien to acquire permanent residency in the U.S.
Are you business savvy? Do you like running your own business and be your own boss? Do you have money to invest? If you answer affirmatively to the above questions, you should consider an alternative that will allow you to become a LPR in the U.S. through investments. Under section 203(b)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, immigrant visas are available to qualified aliens seeking permanent resident status on the basis of their engagement in a new commercial enterprise. LABOR CERTIFICATION/PERM is NOT REQUIRED.
This alternative to become a LPR is available to you and your immediate family members when you have invested, or are actively in the process of investing, the required amount of capital into a new commercial enterprise that they have established. You may be eligible by establishing a new commercial enterprise. A new commercial enterprise includes creating an original business, purchasing an existing business and later restructuring or reorganizing the business such that a new commercial enterprise results, or expanding an existing business. The total amount of investment you need is at least $1,000,000 or $500,000 in a "targeted employment area," which is an area that has experienced unemployment of at least 150% of the national average rate and your new enterprise should create 10 full-time employment for qualified individuals.
If you qualify, you should file with USCIS an Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur with supporting documentation demonstrating that your investments meet all the requirements. Once the petition is approved, you don’t need to wait for an immigrant visa. You may immediately file for Adjustment of Status to obtain legal status as conditional residents for two years. Before the end of the 2-year conditional status, you may file a petition to remove the conditions and become lawful permanent residents.
With the backlog of immigrant visas, becoming LPR’s through investments is one alternative you should consider now.
BUSH'S COMMITMENT TO IMMIGRATION REFORM, POLITICS, OR POLICY?
President Bush announced an immigration reform plan on January 7, 2004 as his administration attempts to obtain more the Hispanic votes for the November election. If enacted, it is clear the changes would be the broadest made to U.S. immigration laws since 1986. It should be cautioned that this is only a proposal, and that any major immigration changes require the consent of congress. In this election year, with Democrats not wishing for Bush to obtain a victory and about 50-70 hard-core anti-immigrant republican congressmen, passage is at best uncertain.
The plan was an attempt to balance the concerns of politically important Hispanic groups seeking to legalize immigrants' status and major employers who want workers for low-paying jobs.
If passed into law, President Bush's plan would permit undocumented foreign nationals to obtain temporary worker status for three years and be eligible for lawful permanent residency through existing employment-based channels. The three-year status would only be renewable once, for a total of six years of temporary status. Under the plan, a person must be an undocumented foreign national with a job at the time of applying for the visa, or a person abroad with a job offer, in order to obtain the temporary worker status. Undocumented foreign nationals will be required to pay a one-time penalty to apply. There will be a system in place for U.S. employers to seek U.S. workers before the nonimmigrant will be granted temporary worker status. If the nonimmigrant loses his/her job, does not follow the terms of the status, or breaks the law, s/he will be required to leave the U.S. Employers are required to inform the U.S. government when a temporary worker starts and ends employment with that employer in what sounds similar to a SEVIS plan for temporary workers. Employers will also be subject to tough enforcement and penalties for hiring undocumented immigrants after the program starts.
Though temporary workers will be permitted to seek lawful permanent resident status, they will be given financial incentives to return to their home countries at the end of their nonimmigrant status. The Administration is attempting to work with other countries to have the temporary workers receive retirement credits in their respective home countries for the time that they work in the United States. President Bush also referred to tax preferred savings accounts as a possibility where the person would obtain the money in the savings account upon his or her departure from the U.S.
President Bush has asked Congress to pass laws that support the plan he described in his speech. This means that, while the President is supportive of the concept of providing legalization opportunities, he has no definite commitment to any particular legislation at this time.
Both pro-immigration and anti-immigration supporters have criticized the Bush proposal. Democrats said the proposal fell far short by failing to ensure long-term illegal immigrants now in the United States could remain permanently, however, this is no a 245(i) law that added many aliens in early 2001, as a general amnesty of the late 1980?s. Both of the proposals allowed a large number of immigrants to become legal permanent residents.
Democratic candidate Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts said it "rewards business over immigrants by providing them with a permanent pool of disenfranchised temporary workers who could easily be exploited." Another Democratic candidate, Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut, called the proposal "an election-year conversion."
U.S. Rep. Thomas Tancredo, a Colorado Republican who leads the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, who argue for more restrictions, said giving temporary status to illegal immigrants under the proposal was a form of amnesty and therefore a "step backward"
Hence, it would be important, at least at this time, for any undocumented alien to place much reliance on the proposals in 2004.
AVOIDING
REMOVAL FOR THE ILLEGAL PRESENT CRIMINAL ALIEN
From reading the title of this column the first reaction of any reader is, or should be --- the only way
to avoid being removed (the new Legal term for deportation) if a criminal alien is illegally in the United
States is to hide out, and in some cases, marry a U.S. Citizen (valid marriages only please).
Obviously, the best way to avoid removal is to avoid having Homeland Security (the new agency that has assumed the old INS functions) even know you are around. However, any alien charged with a crime, and particularly an illegal alien, does not have that luxury. Indeed, the leading reason that aliens are picked up by Homeland Security is because of criminal related detention. But there are ways to avoid, at least temporarily, Homeland Security even if you are being held for a crime by non-federal authorities.
In a recent case we handled (obviously we cannot tell the name of the client we assisted) the client was an illegal alien with his entire family living Southern California. He had a prior conviction that would have been considered an aggravated felony if he was detained by Homeland Security, meaning little hope of staying in the country. This is not even considering that he was also here illegally.
Homeland Security interviews criminals in jails only after judgment in the criminal matter has been determined. However, they do not conduct these interviews until after a few days of the judgment because it takes about two days for the sheriff to generate these conviction rosters. If the convicted criminal has been released usually (but not always) Homeland Security will not bother to track down the convicted criminal for an interview. They are just too busy.
A judgment in a criminal case is not considered entered until after the judge issues a sentence. Hence, a criminal could plead guilty, but not be sentenced the same day if a lawyer knows the system to arrange to delay sentencing.
So why does delaying sentencing matter? In Los Angeles County, and many other places jails are overcrowded. There are federal decrees to avoid this overcrowding. Also, inmate gets good time credits while they are awaiting hearing, and in some occasions even more while they are waiting than when after they are sentenced. However, judges and prosecutors want to obtain plea bargains quickly to insure convictions and move cases along before witnesses become lost and evidence becomes stale.
In our case we were able to obtain a favorable plea bargain, based in part on evidence we were able to develop that questioned the reliability of the alleged victim, that would have obtained the release of our client, including good time credits, to about 30 days away, which was the trial date anyway. We said that there would only be a deal if we were able to delay sentencing to a date when the accused would be released the day of sentencing.
TRAVEL ADVISORY FOR ALIENS TO UNITED STATES
18 August 2003
Any alien who plans to travel abroad and returns to the United States on time should be aware of important changes in visa application procedures. The Department of State (DOS) recently announced that U.S. embassies and consulates must interview ALL applicants for non-immigrant working visas unless they meet one of the limited exceptions. It will take longer for visa applications to be processed. Changes at U.S. Embassies and Consulates may make it difficult for many executives, managers, professionals, researchers and other fully-authorized foreign workers to have their visa applications processed in time to return to the U.S. when their jobs require. These same changes may complicate trips abroad and the ability to attend professional conferences, business meetings and important personal or family events. It will now be more essential than ever to plan far in advance to the United States.
Over the past two decades an increasing number of American Consular offices exercised their discretion to waive personal interviews for many visa applicants, especially those coming to the U.S. on work visas from Europe, Japan, Australia and other developed countries. Interview waivers, and the increasing use of 'mail-in' and visa courier option, have helped speed up the visa issuance process in the face of persistent staff and budget shortages. That has changed. Almost all temporary visa applicants between the ages of 16 and 60 will be required to schedule personal interviews at an American Consulate.
This new requirement will result in significant delays for nonimmigrant visa appointments. Many visa applicants will likely face a delay of several weeks to several months in order to obtain a nonimmigrant visa appointment at the embassy or consulate in their home country. Furthermore, the DOS expects that for the indefinite future, many embassies/consulates will face processing backlogs to issue the visa even after the interview.
These additional requirements are going to place severe new burdens on nonimmigrant travel and will require extensive advance planning. In order to avoid delays and disruptions to business and holiday plans, travel arrangements should be made months in advance and appointments should be secured ahead of time.
The personal interview requirement may only be waived by an embassy or consulate if it is determined that the applicant presents no "national security concern," AND in the following circumstances:
(1) A child 16 years of age or younger;
(2) A person 60 years of age or older;
(3) A class of nonimmigrant classifiable under the visa categories A-1, A-2, C-2, C-3, G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO-1, NATO-2, NATO-3, NATO-4, NATO-5, or NATO-6 and who is seeking a visa in such classification;
(4) An applicant for a diplomatic or official visa as described in the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at section 41.26 and 41.27;
(5) An applicant who, within twelve months of the expiration of the applicant's previously issued visa, is seeking re-issuance of the nonimmigrant visa in the same classification at the consular post of the alien's usual residence, and for whom the consular officer has no indication of visa ineligibility or noncompliance with U.S. immigration laws and regulations; or
(6) An alien for whom a waiver of personal appearance is warranted in the national interest or because of unusual circumstances.
Under the current political and immigration climate, we recommend that you do not make international travel plans without checking with a law office or U.S. Department of State website for information on the visa application procedures for American Embassies and Consulates abroad. Keep in mind that the exact procedures and methods to schedule interviews now and after August 1 are subject to change and are different in each country.
IMMIGRANTS WITH A CRIMINAL PAST RECORD MUST BE EXTRA CAREFUL IN LIGHT OF NEW
SUPREME COURT DECISION
30 April 2003
The U.S. Supreme Court in Denmore v. Kim has just ruled that Congress, justifiably concerned that eportable criminal aliens who were not detained would continue to engage in crime and would fail to appear for their removal hearings in large numbers, could require that such aliens be detained for the brief period necessary for their removal proceedings, without providing individualized determination as to whether aliens presented flight risks, and thus detention of alien, pursuant to no-bail provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act, did not violate his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Previously, the Ninth Circuit and numerous other U.S.
These detentions will now occur even if the alien poses no threat to flee and would return to any future hearing. Interestingly, the Supreme Court may have left a possible avenue for bond in some cases. The court particularly referred to a Board of Immigration Appeals case Matter of Joseph which states that a lawful permanent resident will not be considered "properly included" in a mandatory detention category when an Immigration Judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals finds, on the basis of the bond record as a whole, that it is substantially unlikely that the government will prevail on a charge of removability.
Hence, if the immigrant can show a probability of defeating the removeability then bond would still be allowable under the recent decision. All aliens with criminal charges or past criminal convictions should seek competent legal counsel immediately as their very stay in the U.S. is now increasing threatened. Indeed, no alien with criminal charges or convictions should attend an immigration hearing or depart the county with an intent to return without first consult counsel competent in both immigration and criminal law.
GOODBYE INS
16 March 2003
In our column two weeks ago, we discussed that in February 2003, the INS was abolished, and the next day, the agency's 36,000 employers were dispersed into three separate bureaus in the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The transition is a cause of great concern regarding to the service side of the new immigration regime.
What's changed?
Folding the INS into the new department marks the biggest overhaul of Immigration Services since June 10, 1933, when the INS was created by combining the Bureau of Immigration and the Bureau of Naturalization, then part of the Labor Department. In 1940, the INS moved into the Department of Justice -- ostensibly to improve security as war engulfed the world.
Throughout its history, the INS has had to balance seemingly contradictory roles of being both a service provider and a law enforcement agency. The agency has been criticized for doing neither very well.
Now, what used to be the INS is being divided into the following bureaus:
* Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (BCIS) - The BCIS is led by Eduardo Aguirre, formerly the Vice Chairman of the Export-Import Bank. The BCIS is responsible for providing information to the public as well as processing applications and petitions for work permits, permanent residence, citizenship, political asylum, etc. The five former INS service centers, district offices and other facilities now bear the BCIS initials.
* Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (BCBP) - Insiders call it "CBP." CBP is led by Robert Bonner, formerly the Commissioner of Customs. The BCBP will focus on the movement of people and goods through land borders, airports and seaports. It combines former Border Patrol agents, Immigration Inspectors with the Customs Service and the Plant and Animal Inspectors from the Department of Agriculture. Officially, the new bureau bills itself as "One Face at the Border."
* Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (BICE) ? Agency insiders call it "ICE" and is led by Michael Garcia, the former Acting Commissioner of the INS. BICE will concentrate its efforts on interior enforcement including apprehension and detention of persons thought to be unlawfully present in the U.S. It will include former INS Special Agents, Deportation and Detention Officers along with enforcement and investigative officers from the Customs Service and the Federal Protective Services.
* Funding - President Bush has submitted to Congress a proposal for a $36.2 billion budget for the DHS. Only $500 million would be designated to improve immigration services, including reducing the backlog and creating an online filing system.
What Remains the Same?
While the abolition of the INS, and the creation of the three new bureaus within the DHS, looks like a sea change regarding immigration benefits and enforcement activities, precious little has changed so far:
* Processing Delays - The five million pending applications and petitions for immigration benefits are still stacked up at the Service Centers and District Offices. Processing delays are not yet behind us, not by a long shot.
* Offices - The addresses and phone numbers of former INS offices and officers remain the same as before. Even the names of the centers remain the same. For example, the "California Service Center" is still called the "California Service Center."
* Filing Fees - Although a quirk in the law reduced filing fees for immigration benefits from January 24 to February 27, the fire sale is now over, and the fees are the same as listed on the forms. Checks should be payable to the "Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services" although, for the time being, if you make your checks out to the "INS," the BCIS will still cash them.
* Immigration/Naturalization Forms - All forms remain the same as before.
Despite the lack of any real change so far, we expect that, over time, a lot of things will change, and we will let you know as soon as they do.
PATRIOT 11's ATTACK ON CITIZENSHIP
DENATURALIZATION: THE CITIZENSHIP DEATH PENALTY
10 March 2003
A draft of the so-called Patriot Act II was revealed to the public, not by government sources, but being leaked to the Center for Public Integrity in January, presents the public with a warning: The basic principle of American democracy is under attack, as an American citizen, you are facing the possibility to get deported without your awareness.
According to the Fourteenth Amendment, citizenship is "the constitutional birthright of every person born in this country." Although citizenship could be voluntarily relinquished, in common sense, it could not be taken away. Our leadership may distrust or despise certain people, but it cannot strip them of their citizenship involuntarily. Murders, child molesters, and tax evaders are subject to criminal punishment, not denationalization. Yet with Patriot II, this basic rule is threatened.
What is Patriot II?
Patriot II is known internally as the Domestic Security Enhancement Act, it is nicknamed Patriot II, or Son of Patriot. Bush?s national security conspirators rush it forward in January for review by their allies on Capitol Hill.
Why Patriot II would affect citizenship?
Section 501 of the bill, deceptively titled "Expatriation of Terrorists," would provide for the presumptive denationalization of American citizens who support the activities of any organization that the executive branch has deemed "terrorist." While it is already illegal to provide material support to such groups, even for their lawful activities, such support is considered grounds only for criminal prosecution, not for the loss of citizenship.
By permitting denationalization based on a person's illegal activities, the Patriot II bill attempts to push the legal rules back toward a time in which Ashcroft and his ilk would feel at home: the McCarthy era.
What you have to be aware to avoid involuntary denationalization under Patriot II?
Patriot II attempts to loosen both the substantive and procedural protections of the right to citizenship. Under Patriot II, as described in the Justice Department's official summary of the bill, a U.S. citizen may be expatriated if, with the intent to relinquish his nationality, he becomes a member of, or provides material support to, a group that the United States has designated as a "terrorist organization."
In terms of substance, the draft legislation simply adds a special possibility "material support to an organization to this list of expatriating acts." If you are a doctor and want to save a cancer patient?s life, please be careful, probably your patient has certain, unknown relationship with Muslim Separatist group in Mindanao that the government has labeled as terrorist! Or if you run a nursing service business, your customers are involved in India Islamic movement, or if you are a teacher, but your students happen to being on the wrong side of any of a number of other political conflicts in the world, you are vulnerable to the loss of your citizenship. So all you have to do is to try your best to avoid any kind of contact with terrorist although it is hard to avoid totally, think twice before you take any action. Please consult a professional lawyer if you have any suspicion or concern regarding this new act.
No matter this draft is passed or not, it will be noted that the supervision and application for American citizenship will be even harder than before. The Government believes that it can exclude American supporters of terrorist groups by expelling these people from the national community, but it has to sacrifice many ordinary citizens and aliens' benefit.
AS LAW ENFORCEMENT INTEGRATES ITS DATABASE NOW, IT IS THE TIME TO LEGALIZE YOUR STAY IN THE U.S.
3 March 2003
Since Sep.11, law enforcement networks are trying together for better access to everyone's personal information, it is predictable that the way to get legal status will be tougher than ever before. Hence, the general government will be better able to identify where illegal aliens are. If you are currently illegal you need to change this situation as soon as possible!
Indeed, law enforcement officials across the country will soon have access to database of 50 million overseas applications for United States visas, including the photographs of 20 million applicants.
The new system will provide 100,000 investigators one source for what the government designates "sensitive but unclassified" information. Officials see it as a breakthrough for law enforcement, saying it will help dismantle the investigative stumbling blocks that were roundly criticized after the Sept. 11 attacks. At the same time, they acknowledge the legal and policy questions raised by information sharing between intelligence agencies and local law enforcement, and critics have cast a wary eye as well at the visa database. One other effect of the new system is that for the first
time, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other agencies linked by it will be able to send one another encrypted e-mail.
The changes come as the F.B.I. continues working to upgrade its entire computer system, which is so antiquated and compartmentalized that it cannot perform full searches of
investigative files.
A primary feature of the system is the State Department's enormous visa database, whose seven terabytes give it a capacity equivalent to that of five million floppy disks. Until now, that database has been shared only with immigration officials.
Officials emphasize that the State Department database is not making any information newly available to law enforcement, simply making such information easier to acquire. But that increasing ease of accessibility raises some concern from civil liberties groups.
Critics also point to what they call the unwelcome precedent of foreign-intelligence sharing with local law enforcement, even if the intelligence community's initial
contribution to the new system may seem somewhat innocuous. That component is the Open Source Information System, a portal where 14 agencies pool unclassified information. Such material in the new system will includes text articles
from foreign periodicals and broadcasts, technical reports and maps.
Two domestic law enforcement networks are also being tied in: Law Enforcement Online, a seven-year-old system established by the F.B.I., and the Regional Information
Sharing Systems, six geographically defined computer networks that help local law enforcement agencies collaborate on regional crime issues like drug trafficking and gangs.
Becoming part of a collaborative computer network is unusual for the F.B.I., which has been criticized for its insular nature and technological sluggishness. As some agents joke, the bureau "likes to have yesterday's technology tomorrow." Many agents do not have direct access from their desks to the Internet, because of security concerns. Instead, some field offices have separate areas that agents refer to as "cybercafes," where they can log on to the Internet.
The bureau is now engaged in a multibillion-dollar effort to upgrade its computer system. A recent report by the Justice Department's inspector general cited mismanagement
of the project, though Director Mueller gave reporters a sunny assessment today, saying among other things that parts of the upgrade would go online in March as scheduled.
As for the new interagency system, other large security and law enforcement computer networks are scheduled for integration with it within the next year.
Hence, it will be harder for illegal aliens or have losing the status to remain in the "shadows" and remain undetected.
FIREARM CRIMES USUALLY LEAD TO DEPORTATION
25 February 2003
In 1998, an amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968
placed restrictions for nonimmigrant aliens to possess or transport
firearms and ammunition in the United States. Under certain circumstances,
special exceptions may be granted to those who are representatives of a
friendly foreign government or those who wish to use firearms for sport or
hunting. The Secretary of the Treasury has the authority to require those
who bring firearms and ammunition into this country for hunting or sporting
purposes to obtain an import permit first.
Read full story
BUSH AND ASHCROFT MAKING LIFE HARDER FOR IMMIGRANTS
18 February 2003
While this column usually addresses helpful hints or
insight for laymen into the nuances of immigration law recent developments
in the administration of the Immigration and Naturalization Act by the
Bush/Ashcroft Justice Department should make the immigrant community wonder
if 'compassionate conservativism' really exists.
Read full
story
BE CAREFUL BEFORE LEAVING THE COUNTRY IF YOU ARE IN V STATUS AWAITING PETITION APPROVAL
14 February 2003
Under the LIFE Act of 2000 certain spouses and children of lawful permanent residents may enter and work in the United States and continue to reside here while waiting for the approval of an immigrant visa petition and a current priority date, in order to file for adjustment of status- or an application for an immigrant visa and the adjudication of that application. Eligible aliens present in the United States who wish to obtain this V nonimmigrant status must file an application to change nonimmigrant status with INS.
However, many eligible aliens are unaware of two serious consequences triggered by traveling abroad after obtaining their V visa approval notice. The first consequence relates to the three and ten year bars and the second relates to the requirement of having a valid V visa endorsed in the passport in order to reenter the United States.
If an alien accrued more than 180 days of unlawful presence when he or she applied for a change of status to the V visa category, he or she will trigger the three or ten year bar when departing the United States. However, for the purpose of admission as a V nonimmigrant, aliens who have accrued more than 180 days of unlawful presence in the United States are not subject to the three- and ten- year bars to admission.
However, the three- and ten-year bars still apply to applicants for immigrant visas or adjustment of status. Therefore, aliens, who have accrued over 180 days of unlawful presence and who depart the United States and reenter with V visas, should be aware that they will not be able to adjust status from V to legal permanent resident. It is important to note that the immigration act waives the three- and ten-year bars to admission only for V nonimmigrant admissions or changing to a V nonimmigrant status, and not for purposes of obtaining immigrant status. When a V nonimmigrant applies for adjustment or for an immigrant visa to obtain permanent resident status, he or she is still subject to the ground of inadmissibility relating to unlawful presence and the bars to admissibility.
For example, if an alien in V nonimmigrant status has accrued more than one year of unlawful presence in the United States, travels abroad, and is readmitted as a V nonimmigrant, that alien - when he or she departed the United States, triggered the 10 year bar to admission. While V visas exempt the prospective alien from this ground of inadmissibility for purposes of obtaining V nonimmigrant status, it does not exempt the alien from that ground of inadmissibility when he or she later applies for an immigrant visa or for adjustment to lawful permanent resident status. That means that he or she will be unable to adjust status for 10 years from the date of departure, unless an individual waiver for that ground of inadmissibility is granted. To the extent that he or she may be eligible, the alien applying to adjust status may apply for the waivers, which can be a complicated and risky process.
Remember, the LIFE Act only exempts V nonimmigrant from the three and ten year bars, it does not provide the same exemption to adjustment or immigrant visa applicants. Furthermore, an alien who does not have a valid V visa stamp in his or her passport must obtain one in order to reenter the United States in V status.
Leaving the U.S. while in adjustment status always can leave the pending immigration petition in peril. Be sure to consult an attorney if you are planning to leave.
|
 |